
Writing objectives that are at a high level is something that I plan on utilizing in the future. In order to make this successful, I will have to teach information that is on a higher level. As Dr. Susie Whittington states, "When we write objectives designed to challenge students at higher cognitive levels, we, as teachers must equally challenge ourselves to teach at higher cognitive levels". This means that in order for students to get the most out of our lessons, students must stay at the same cognitive level throughout the lesson. If students are taught on a low cognitive level and are tested on a high cognitive level, it is not fair to them and vise-versa. I want to make the lessons meaningful for myself, and my students!
Group assignments are good, but to a certain extent. Group projects must be small enough so all of the members can actively give input and engage with the other students. Having students pick their own groups may not be the best decision whenever the groups are more than a few people, groups need to have different strengths and ideas from all of the members. This is another reason for me, in the future, to really get to know my students. Learning where their strengths and weaknesses are will benefit not only that one student, but the whole classroom!
This weeks reading was very interesting and helpful for me at this point whenever I am figuring out what kind of teacher I want to be.
Thanks,
Mike
I have created a set of index cards with my students names on them and use them for a multitude of purposes in class. One purpose is creating groups. In the beginning, I will tell them that I'm dealing the "Deck of Names" to randomly create groups and lay out the cards. Then, as I get to know the students and I figure out their strengths, I will sometimes "stack the deck" so I put the cards in the order I want the groups to happen yet still "create" groups live in front my students by going to the deck to see the "random" groups that happen
ReplyDelete